Care Management for Cardiology Practices

Reviewed by Jack Wright, Managing Partner

Care management for cardiology practices is one of the best fits in medicine for a Medicare program, yet most either skip it or hand it to an outside vendor. Patients with heart failure, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, or two or more chronic conditions need steady between-visit coordination and home monitoring, and Medicare pays your practice for work your team is often doing already. This page is for the cardiology owner or administrator deciding whether to build that program in-house, and which programs actually fit a heart-disease panel.

Which programs fit a cardiology panel

Cardiology is the specialty where remote monitoring and care management overlap most cleanly, because so much of the panel is measurable at home.

Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) follows home blood pressure, weight, and heart rate between visits. It is the canonical cardiology fit: daily weights for a heart-failure patient and home blood-pressure readings for a hypertension patient give you the data you already want, and Medicare pays for the setup, the device month, and the time spent reviewing it.
Chronic Care Management (CCM) fits the common cardiology patient who carries two or more chronic conditions, such as coronary artery disease with hypertension and hyperlipidemia, and needs whole-patient coordination across their medications and other physicians.
Complex CCM covers the sicker, multi-morbid heart-failure patient whose month takes more staff time and more care-plan change than standard CCM allows for.
Principal Care Management (PCM) pays for monthly management of one high-risk condition, which fits a heart-failure patient a cardiologist is managing as the single driver of their risk. For a given patient in a given month, one practitioner bills CCM or PCM, not both, so choosing the right program matters.

RPM is billed separately from CCM or PCM, and its minutes are logged apart from your coordination time, so a heart-failure patient on daily weights can be enrolled in monitoring and in care management at once when the work and the time are tracked separately.

What Medicare actually pays

Most cardiology practices that do care management at all outsource it to a vendor that keeps a percentage of every payment. Before you accept that model, it helps to see what Medicare pays your practice for the work. These amounts come from the published Medicare physician fee schedule, and CMS keeps its own care management billing guidance for each program. They are the 2026 national non-facility amounts, not adjusted for your locality:

CCM, first 20 minutes of clinical-staff time each month (99490): $66.13, with each additional 20 minutes (99439) at $50.44.
Complex CCM, 60 minutes (99487): $144.29.
RPM device supply for the month (99454): $52.11, plus the first 20 minutes of monitoring management (99457) at $51.77 and each added 20 minutes (99458) at $41.42.
PCM by clinical staff, 30 minutes (99426): $67.80.

Those are per-code Medicare amounts, not a promise of what any practice will collect, which depends on your panel, your enrollment, and your documentation. To put real numbers against your own patient counts, use our care management revenue calculator. The point of the figures is simpler: this is money Medicare pays the practice that holds the claim, and a revenue-share vendor takes a cut of it.

Why cardiology practices build it in-house instead of using a revenue-share vendor

The claim goes out under your NPI. The revenue, the records, and the audit exposure are yours no matter who does the work, so a revenue-share vendor takes a percentage of something your practice is already accountable for.
Your own staff hold the patient relationship and the data. A coordinator who knows the heart-failure patient and works inside your systems reads a worrying trend in the home weights sooner than an outside call center does.
A proposed CY2027 Medicare rule would let RPM and RTM be billed only when the clinical staff furnishing them are the billing practice’s own employees. It covers RPM and RTM only, and it is still a proposal, not a final rule. Because RPM sits at the center of a cardiology program, a practice that runs monitoring through a vendor today has the most to gain from moving it in-house on its own timeline, and there is a transition checklist for doing it.

Building in-house is not effortless. It takes the right program selection, the right staffing and supervision, documented workflows, and billing discipline. That build is the work PMC does through its care management implementation service, and it sits alongside the broader practice consulting a growing cardiology group often needs at the same time.

What PMC does in setup

Practice Management Consultancy designs and builds the program. Your own employees run it day to day, and your practice or your biller submits the claims. A typical cardiology setup covers:

Program selection: which of RPM, CCM, Complex CCM, and PCM fit your panel, and how to combine monitoring with coordination without counting the same staff minute twice.
A staffing model built around your own employees: who does the monthly monitoring review and care coordination, under whose supervision, and how their time is captured and logged. A care coordinator job description that matches the billing rules is part of this.
Workflows and SOPs: enrollment, consent, the home-device setup, the monthly touchpoints, documentation, and a time log that holds up in an audit.
Vendor-neutral platform selection: we help you pick the blood-pressure cuffs, scales, and monitoring software that suit your practice, and we do not sell one.
Billing-mechanics consulting: the codes, modifiers, date-of-service rules, and the denials to expect, so the claims your team submits are right the first time.

We designed and built this kind of in-house program at a non-surgical joint clinic our founder operates. The specialty differs, but the build is the same work, program selection, a staffing model around the practice’s own employees, audit-ready documentation, and clean billing. The six-month write-up walks through what we built and who runs it.

What this is not

PMC implements and advises. We do not run your monitoring program, we do not employ your coordinators, and we do not operate your billing. Your staff runs the program, and your team or your biller submits the claims. We build it so they can.

Common questions

Remote monitoring is central to cardiology. Can we run it in-house without a dedicated team?

Often, yes. Part of program selection is sizing the monthly monitoring-review and coordination work against the staff you already have, and deciding whether an existing clinical employee can take it on under the right supervision before anyone hires. We design the staffing model around your practice, not a fixed headcount.

We use a monitoring vendor now. Does the 2027 proposal force a change?

Not today. The proposed employee-staffing requirement covers RPM and RTM only, and it is still a proposal awaiting a final rule. It does not touch outsourced CCM or PCM. Moving monitoring in-house now is about controlling the timeline on your own terms instead of scrambling if the rule is finalized as written.

If you are weighing an in-house program against a vendor, book a call and we will map which programs fit your cardiology panel and what the build will take.

Book a discovery call